How does Uwe Boll keep making films? It's a mystery of the universe. Maybe it has something to do with karmic balance. To quote Nick at CHUD : "Of course, I'm biased. I've never seen a Uwe Boll film. I've also never covered my genitals in peanut butter and straddled the face of a lion."
Couldn't possibly sum things up better than that ... click here for the pain. Ben! Michael! Never do anything like this again!
Got something to get off your chest? Click here for contact details.
Tired of listening to us prattle on? Join the Twitch Forum and have your own say!
A continual work in progress, our hefty list of upcoming, interesting DVD releases from around the world. Click here to let us know about any upcoming releases.
Shop at our affiliated sites and support Twitch while feeding your pop-culture addiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|

Cheese-o-rama! :D Straight to video in the UK maybe ;)
» Posted by Hates_ at January 31, 2005 03:15 PM
Well, here's the deal:
Nothing could be WORSE than Alone in the Dark. The movie caused me physical pain.
» Posted by crazybee at January 31, 2005 03:20 PM
17 million... this movie cost 17 million dollars. It's astounding how you get much better films from Asia with fraction of the costs.
» Posted by Fabool at January 31, 2005 05:38 PM
I think Kingsley is preparing his retierment. He's been in just about every crap film for the last year. Must be getting paid a pretty penny.
» Posted by Swarez at January 31, 2005 05:53 PM
If your trailer actually manages to make people laugh and it isnt a comedy, the trailer might not be good afterall.
» Posted by David at January 31, 2005 08:13 PM
Seventeen mil? Go watch the MirrorMask trailer again. That cost four. Where do these people spend the money? It boggles the mind ...
» Posted by Todd at January 31, 2005 09:54 PM
I'm guessing 14M was spent on crack for Uwe Boll.
» Posted by Essaman at January 31, 2005 11:07 PM