REVIEW of SPIDERMAN 3

Worst movie I've seen in 2007. I've published my review over at my site if you'll allow for a little self promotion here on Twitch. But the gist of the artcle is: don't pay money to see this.

total disapoinment, i hope the rest of the season improves a bit or else i would never see another franchise in my life

Thanks for the heads-up. How could this movie be anything but bad? The whole superhero concept was juvenile to start with and is played out.

I actually thought it was pretty good. Sure, it was quirky, awkward and a little silly at moments, and sure there was a couple of plot holes, but it was still good. I'm not emo. I'm not mad. This movie actually was good. People interpret things differently. I liked it.

It was a fairly good film, but nowhere near good enough to warrant its astronomical budget.

as T.S. Eliot wrote..."What happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the works that preceded it. The existing monuments create an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new(the really new) workof art among them....Whoever has approved this idea of order will not find it preposterous that the past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past."

i doubt your enjoyably scathing review would be so passionate had we not been given Spider-Man 2...

tangent...i have unlimited hate for the insultingly stupid X-Men movies after watching the X-Men Animated Series of the 90's

> i doubt your enjoyably scathing review would be so passionate had we not been given Spider-Man 2...

That's quite astute of you, Control, and spot on. I loved Spiderman 2 and am sure my disappointment stemmed from that.

whats wrong with you all?!!! I loved it. Sure, it was silly at times, and a bit stupid, but all movies have their flaws. It was great. I reckon it was the best of all three so far and I really hope there will be a number four.

Bring on Spiderman 4 !!!!

Spiderman 3 was a great dissapointment. Going into the movie im sure every viewer expect it to be great or even better then 1 and 2 but this was not so. Its lame plot and somewhat overly cheezy parts make for a flop. In the movie MJ's singing carrier is short lived and hard for the audience to listen to, was this some foreshadowing for the audience that the movie would do exactly that? Near the end of the film everyone in the theater stood up to leave and the movie started again...was it just me or was the movie much to long? The highlight had to be spiderman sporting his hardcoar emo hair do after being takin over by venom...now that spells scarry! Through the fast paced chase scenes to the fact that every character in this movie broke into tears at one point or another shows that the facts are clear, this movie ruined spideys image. As all of the people in the theater got up at the end, humming about how they wasted their night and money while rubbing their bottoms because they had gone numb from sitting to long the sucess of the movie was blatently clear; what a waste!

So I saw it. Like a train wreck, I just couldn't look away. Parts of it I liked. Other parts made me cringe and groan in a very negative way. But, as far as I'm concerned, the movie redeems itself with Stan Lee's cameo. It brought tears to my eyes. And Venom looked cool. Not as good as the first two, but superior to X-men 3 (which suffered from the same problem: too much story to tell) and Superman Returns (barf).

Animation work in spiderman-3 is superb.....[:)]
making of sandman is great....
i like spiderman-3 very much.
i am waiting for spiderman-4