January 19, 2006

PSIFF Report: Korean Backlash -- Notes on Lady Vengeance, Welcome to Dongmakgol, and The Bow

(Posted In Asia Drama Random Festival News )

ladyvengeance2.jpgBefore I could finalize this entry, which was due to be posted last week, my computer crashed. Subsequently, so did my body and spirit. Which makes me the perfect person to write about these three Korean films in particular, because each, in its own way, seeks to heal the soul. (Scroll to my PPS to read comments about the fest crowd.)

Judging by the disapproving finger-wagging critiques issued by otherwise liberal American critics after the release of OLDBOY last year, Park Chan-wook knows nothing about curing or restoring anybody to health. OLDBOY tore out guts and threw away emotions like used tissue paper. The first part of director Park's "revenge" trilogy, SYMPATHY FOR MR. VENGEANCE, arguably better structured and morally precise about its thematic concerns, sank without causing much of a ripple when it finally received a US cinema release last summer.

Park's parting shot on the subject, LADY VENGEANCE, should wake people up when it debuts in the US on March 24 (courtesy of Tartan Films).

Somehow I had mistakenly developed the impression from quickly-skimmed reviews (including X's excellent, mammoth, very personal look) that this would be a more mature, quieter, less violent examination on the human cost of revenge. It's nothing of the sort: Park continues to wade into brutality with outstretched arms, embracing the ugliest human instincts without a moment's hesitation, and it's difficult to see much artistic growth throughout the trilogy.

Yet it's Park's infantile rush toward the darkest part of his soul that makes him a valuable artist. He doesn't simply splash gore and blood on the screen out of a gleeful desire to shock -- which seems the raison d'être for some horror filmmakers. Nor is he anything like Quentin Tarantino -- a facile comparison that crumbles upon inspection because Tarantino has yet to make a film inspired by real life, as opposed to the "reel" history that fuels his work.

Instead, Park wants to elicit reactions both visceral and psychological. Even as one shudders at the distasteful images in LADY VENGEANCE (or MR. VENGEANCE or OLDBOY), it's impossible to dismiss entirely the primal urges that the images arouse. And, as they say in gyms across the world: "no pain, no gain." It should prove interesting to read comparisons US critics will inevitably make with a film like Steven Spielberg's MUNICH, whose earnestly "mature" politics are worn on its sleeve. Thanks to the cinematic gods, Park Chan-wook is not that mature.

LADY VENGEANCE can be purchased here.

Far different on the surface, WELCOME TO DONGMAKGOL (review) appears to be an entertaining, if routine, anti-war film, close in spirit to the French rouser-with-bite JOYEUX NOEL (aka MERRY CHRISTMAS; review), which has also been submitted for the best foreign-language Oscar nod. Between the two, I'm not sure which is "better" in a subjective sense, but one made me tear up and the other didn't. As always, your emotional mileage may vary.

WELCOME suffers from "first film blues" -- debut feature director Park Kwang-hyun draws out several scenes to unsupportable lengths -- but if you're at all open to the subject matter (the possibility of peace in a war-mad world and the potential for unselfish actions by imperfect people), it performs a little dance on the head of negative thinking and stirs up thoughts of what could be.

WELCOME TO DONGMAKGOL can be purchased here.

Respected, well-meaning but arrogant Asian film critics have warned Westerners against the evils of Kim Ki-Duk, but, strangely enough for a writer born near Hollywood, I like to form my own opinions.

THE BOW is very nearly a complete disaster because it appears to copy the director's earlier BAD GUY (an ugly story about a young girl captured by a mute man who holds her captive) with more unpleasant riffs (the girl is even younger and apparently happy with her odd imprisonment). The "twist" is that she actually becomes unhappy and wants to break free when a more age-appropriate love interest enters the picture.

As usual, Kim presents his story without fuss or fancy. That is to say, though his films lack visual trickery, the cinematography is beautiful in a way that doesn't draw attention to itself, and his camera is always placed and moved in a fluid, unobtrusive style. In his review, Todd described in detail his reasons for concluding that THE BOW is "a beautiful, complex, conversation starter." I don't feel as positive as he did about the film, but I agree that Kim is reaching for something here that cannot be easily put aside. Days later, though I still find the premise unbelievably contrived, I continue to rewind and wrestle with certain scenes -- the girl on a swing, her feet splashing through the ocean, the old man shooting arrows at her to tell fortunes -- that refuse to stop circling in my mind.

THE BOW can be purchased here.

P.S. I first wrote about the "Korean backlash" at my site (A Better Tomorrow) in April 2002. It was an easy prophecy to make, since everything is cyclical in cinema. With the passage of nearly four years, it's interesting to see how more recent Korean films have been received in the West -- and how the backlash has developed.

P.P.S. Cheers to the Palm Springs seniors who crowded the screenings. It was very disconcerting to wait in line with a silver-haired gentleman with a hearing aid who bubbled over about the region-free DVD player he had purchased so he could watch comedies like MY SASSY GIRL and MY WIFE IS A GANGSTER (1 and 2!), and to hear matronly women talking about this wonderful SPRING SUMMER movie. And do you know how many people -- some looking old enough to be my grandparents -- really really liked OLDBOY? Whatever happened to the young having exclusive rights to knowing about strange, odd little films from around the world?

» Posted by Peter Martin at January 19, 2006 01:18 AM
Digg This / Add To del.icio.us

Reader Comments

Excellent reviews, Peter. I was overwhelmed on seeing the first installment of the Vengeance trilogy and I was even more surprised by Lady Vengeance, esp. after reading so many lukewarm reviews. I hope it gets the attention it deserves when it hits our shores. At the other end of the spectrum, I guess I'm too cynical to appreciate Dongmakgol's message of love and peace, though there certainly is no lack of eye candy on display. Re: backlash, Do you think the answer lies in more co-productions with Japan, China, et al?

» Posted by jon pais at January 19, 2006 04:15 AM

BFI recently posted a very interesting article the violence in Korean cinema, as well as some possible historical and social reasons. It's a very interesting read, and while it doesn't quite redeem Lady Vengeance for me (I thought it was the weakest of the three movies by far), it does give some food for thought.

» Posted by opus at January 19, 2006 10:14 AM

Very Interesting article indeed, by Kaiju Shakedown's own Grady Hendrix...Excellent survey of Korean cinema for the initiated or unintiated alike...

There is one small error in the piece, It was Rex Reed which made the Kimchi/Earthenware Pots comment, not Andrew Sarris.

» Posted by Kurt at January 19, 2006 11:09 AM

Ah freak. Totally forgot about this event....though I'm kinda surprised I didn't see anything about it in leading up to the event.

There are few enough film festivals in the Southern California region as it is.

» Posted by CTDeLude at January 19, 2006 12:38 PM

Don't get me wrong--I love Grady, never miss Kaiju Shakedown--but his brief survey of violence in Korean cinema, "Vengeance is Theirs" is a tad too glib for the uninitiated. His tongue-in-cheek portrayal of "Welcome to Dongmakgol" as a "goofy culture-clash flick about the Korean War" and his dismissal of "A Tale of Two Sisters" as a "mutated take on the J-horror wave" are not to be taken seriously. But then again, readers of the slightly stuffy British journal Sight and Sound probably know that.

» Posted by jon pais at January 19, 2006 01:48 PM

Actually, the piece being of a look at the forest, not the trees, overview and western perception...I many not agree with some of his so-called glib remarks, but it more than gets the job done...It's opinion after all, not fact!

Certainly worth a look for anyone following, or looking to follow the S.Korean wave since 2002 or so..

» Posted by Kurt at January 19, 2006 03:22 PM

"Actually, the piece being of a look at the forest, not the trees, overview and western perception...I many not--Quote, Kirk

Ohhh, I get it now, Kurt--it's about Western perceptions of Korean cinema...and that it's o.k. to cut down a few trees 'cause were lookin' at the forest...

Grady is worth reading because he is usually perceptive as well as highly entertaining. His passionate defense of underappreciated works like "Sympathy for Mr Vengeance" and his recent bashing of "Zenda" prove however, that he doesn't have to be either witty or clever to get his point across.

Anyone familiar with Korean cinema knows that "The President's Last Bang" is much more than just a political satire & that "Welcome to Dongmakgol" is not merely "a goofy culture-clash flick." If those and other similar statements were read in all earnestness by a neophyte, he would surely be missing out on some of the best cinema has to offer today. My points are:

1) Grady's work is usually perceptive & highly entertaining
2) Grady's writing does not depend on cleverness to be effective
3) Cleverness gets in the way of good judgement in the BFI article

» Posted by jon pais at January 19, 2006 07:53 PM

Hey - thanks for the comments. I'm still red over the Rex Reed/Andrew Sarris mix-up. I totally get your point about sounding glib, but quite honestly it had more to do with word count than with dismissing the movies. I actually like TALE OF TWO SISTERS quite a bit, and I think calling it a mutated take on the J-horror wave isn't as dismissive as you do. I have a lot of respect for what Kim Ji-Won did with that film, especially the way he actually finds an emotional center in the last scene, something that I think way too many recent horror movies are sorely lacking. Unfortunately, any comments I had on TALE had to be put on hold (I talk about it a bit in an earlier FILM COMMENT article) because I just didn't have space to do much with it and still do justice to what I'd been hired to write about (SYMPATHY and BITTERSWEET in particular).

As for DONGMAKOL - I know a lot of people like it but it just didn't appeal to me at all. The only reason I even mentioned it was to contrast the overseas excitement in 2005 for SYMPATHY FOR LADY V with the fact that a rather mainstream, non-extreme movie was actually what was doing big business in Korea at the same time. I think among distributors the perception of Asian cinemas is way different than the reality. I wish a US distributor would take a chance on any number of excellent Korean movies that don't fit the genre mold: CHRISTMAS IN AUGUST, JSA, BARKING DOGS NEVER BITE, and so on.

» Posted by Grady Hendrix at January 19, 2006 09:47 PM

nice work as always, Grady.

I wonder, is the Lady V review by Tony Rayns? Last time I was subscribed to the mag, he was the one who would review Korean movies, usually.

» Posted by x at January 20, 2006 01:05 AM

Post Your Comments

Remember Me?   

(You may use HTML tags for style.)

  

Buy DVDs At The Twitch Store

Stuff We Like

Shop at our affiliated sites and support Twitch while feeding your pop-culture addiction.

Find your favorites


eThaiCD